First off, Happy New Year to all my Econoblog readers. If you want a review of 2013, rather than rabbittng on here, I thought I would just point you to a wonderful article in The Atlantic on the Most Important Economic Trends in 2013 which you can find here. In this Econoblog I want to look ahead to what might happen in 2014, as some eminent economists have been doing at the most recent American Economics Association meeting..
As the business cycle is now in heading into the later part
of the cycle, with the danger of recession and deflation receding, most
countries will experience accelerating growth this year. Although markets are jittery about the Fed’s
signal to taper monetary policy, this is long overdue in my view, and will only
have a marginal effect on economic growth in the US and other developing
countries. The economic process of
re-invigorating the economy through stimulus has now done its magic, and in
North America, Europe and now Japan, the growth dynamic has started to take on
a life of its own, so that the agents of stimulus can now withdraw their
assistance as a catalyst for economic growth.
So there are 2 further issues here – first, how will
economic growth be distributed among the developed countries, and second, given
what is going on in the developed world, what are the prospects for the
developing countries.
Although the consensus is almost uniformally positive for the US for 2014, it is still probably the most uncertain country in the
developing world to forecast for 2014, as there are so many factors that might
impinge upon economic growth rates. The most notable are fiscal matters and the
political problems in Congress, the ongoing taper, and when the actual
tightening of monetary policy will begin, how movements in long term interest
rates will impact the housing market and also lastly, how the dollar will
behave during the upcoming year. If the
current truce in Congress yields more bi-partisan consensus on how to move
ahead in other contentious areas (such as immigration reform, for example),
then this could boost growth as confidence is at least partially restored in
the US political process. Given a
brighter fiscal outlook, this would mean that Fed purchases of government bonds
could be slowed much more quickly than Mortgage backed securities (MBS), which
would allow a residual boost to the housing market rather than propping up a
shaky Federal government credit rating. Longer term interest rates are key in
determining the course of mortgage rates, and if the Fed keeps these low enough
for long enough, the housing market could really boom, setting off a real
investment boom in the rest of the economy.
Of course everything could go the other way as well, leading to a
further downgrade in the credit rating of US debt, a Fed that ends up having to
reverse the taper because of a sagging labor market, and a housing market that
experiences a bubble because of prices rising too far too fast.
In my view, the history of economic cycles points to a positive future though for the US, and although some of the shorter term cyclical effects will be present, the dominant longer term cyclical features will push the US forward without any major internal economic dislocations, leading to another good year for both the housing and stock markets. This of course implies another bad year for the bond market with yields moving upwards to levels more typically associated with this stage of the business cycle.
But perhaps the best opportunities in North America lie not in the US, but in Canada. The Canadian market has been extremely stable through the recent turmoil and the Canadian stockmarket has really not shown much of a return compared with its US counterpart, which in my opinion is almost counter-intuitive, but is probably based on the perception that Canada has an economy based much more on commodities than the US does. Nevertheless, in my view the Canadian market still has much less downside risk that the US market does, and much more upside.
Japan and the EU have less potential for growth as
demographic factors restrain both entities. The fact that Abenomics seems to continue
to deliver the goods will push Japanese markets higher and lead to the
deflationary threat receding. In the EU
the resurgence of the northern member states will continue and the Southern
member states will start to emerge from the difficult deflationary period they
have been in.
The biggest risks, but also the biggest rewards in 2014, lie
in the developing world. Developing
country markets were rocked by the initial announcement of a taper, but now
that the ongoing taper and then tightening has been priced into the markets the
real effects on the developing markets should be apparent. As monetary
tightening occurs in the US, so the liquidity glut will start to disappear,
putting some pressure on developing countries.
Now the big question is, how big will the impact be on countries like
the BRICSA countries. Brazil should be
cushioned by the massive infrastructure spending going on there for the
Olympics and the World Cup, while Russia really is not dependent on the stimulus
as it is natural resource prices that really drive the Russian market. South Africa is certainly not a large holder
of US bonds so the taper will likely have minimal effects on that country. No, the biggest risk is in both China and
India, where both countries have a significant interest in holdings of US
debt.
Given the negative announcement effect of the Fed’s taper, I
believe that possibly the best performing markets will be in Canada, parts of Latin America,
Africa and parts of Europe next year. Now I have put my neck on the line, let's see what happens!
